Web7 See CC v KK and STCC [2012] EWHC 2136 (COP) at paragraph 22 per Baker J. “… I bear in mind and adopt the important observations of Macur J in LBL v RYJ [2010] EWHC 2664 (Fam) (at paragraph 24), that ‘it is not necessary for the person to comprehend every detail of the issue … it is not always necessary for a person WebWhat is important is that they can process the ‘salient factors’: [3] LBJ v RYJ [2010] EWHC 2664 (Fam). the information relevant to the decision. This means that it is your job not just to identify the specific decision (as discussed above) but also what the information is that is relevant to that decision, and what the options are that P is to choose between.
Thinking about specific types of decision - Capacity guide
WebITW v Z & Ors [2009] EWHC 2525 (Fam) KK v STCC [2012] EWHC 2136 LB Haringey v FG [2011] EWHC 3932 (COP) LBL v RYJ & Anor [2010] EWHC 2665 (COP) LBX v K, L, and M [2013] EWHC 3230 (Fam) (2013) MLO 148 London Borough of Redbridge v G, C, and F [2014] EWHC 485 (COP) Loughlin v Singh & Ors [2013] EWHC 1641 (QB) Malette v … Web1 sep. 2011 · Making the right decision. The High Court has delivered an important ruling on the capacity of an individual to make decisions about residence, care and treatment as well as the role of the jointly instructed expert. Alex Ruck Keene and Victoria Butler-Cole review the case. In PH v A Local Authority and Z Limited and R [2011] EWHC 1704 (Fam ... how smart are sharks
LBX v K & Ors [2013] EWHC 3230 (Fam) England and Wales …
WebDL v A Local Authority [2012] EWCA Civ 253, [2012] MHLO 32. A Local Authority v DL [2011] EWHC 1022 (Fam) A Local Authority v DL [2010] EWHC 2675 (Fam) Summary … Web3 jul. 2012 · To the same effect Macur J in LBL v RYJ and VJ [2010] EWHC 2665 (COP), [2010] COPLR Con Vol 795, [25]: “capacity is to be assessed in relation to the particular type of decision at the time the decision needs to be made and not the person's ability to make decisions generally or in abstract.”. Google Scholar 18. Web1 sep. 2011 · endorsing the conclusion of Macur J in LBL v RYJ [2010] EWHC 2664 (Fam) that attention must be given to whether the person must comprehend the salient details … merry christmas written in fancy letters