Finch v surrey county council november 2021
WebFeb 22, 2024 · On 17 February 2024, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (Finch) v Surrey CC [2024] EWCA Civ 187, concerning a judicial review of the grant of planning permission for four new oil wells on a site in Surrey, to produce hydrocarbons over a period of 25 years.. The central issue in the claim was whether the mineral planning … WebNov 17, 2024 · A woman who opposes oil drilling near her home has begun a legal challenge at the High Court. Sarah Finch, from Redhill, is fighting Surrey County …
Finch v surrey county council november 2021
Did you know?
WebHearing dates: 16 and 17 November 2024 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Approved Judgment ... Finch v Surrey County Council The Senior President of Tribunals: Introduction 1. The basic question in this case is whether, under Directive 2011/92 EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (“the EIA Directive”) and the Town and ... WebJudgment Approved by the court for handing down. R (Finch) v Surrey County Council (3) Alternatively, paragraph 183 of the NPPF and paragraphs 12 and 112 of the Minerals PPG are unlawful because they are not in conformity with the obligations of the EIA Directive and their application in this instance vitiated the defendant’s decision. 18.
WebFeb 3, 2024 · The BBC has been fined £28,000 after it made a video and audio recording of a half day’s hearing in the Planning Court. Mr Justice Holgate had been hearing … WebFinch) v Surrey County Council [2024] EWCA Civ 187 (17 February 2024) 1. Judicial review of a grant of planning permission for 4 new oil wells on a site ... Greenpeace v Advocate General [2024] CSIH 53 1. Project: extraction of oil in an oil field in North Sea. 2. Question: should the EIA have included the downstream impacts of
WebThe appeal hearing took place on 16-17 November 2024. The Appellant (Ms Finch) argued that the scope 3 emissions were “likely significant effects of the development” which … WebAug 23, 2024 · Support us and go ad-free. A years-long legal battle against an onshore oil project in Surrey is heading to the Supreme Court. In February, the Court of Appeal ruled that Surrey County Council had ...
WebMar 24, 2024 · Sarah Finch, from Redhill, is challenging Surrey County Council's decision to allow the Horse Hill well to be extended. A High Court judge last year dismissed her …
WebNov 19, 2024 · Finch (on behalf of the Weald Action Group) (claimant/appellant) v Surrey County Council & others Finch (on behalf of the Weald Action Group) … olive colored oversized hoodieWebFeb 6, 2024 · Case Law: R (Finch) v Surrey County Council, BBC fined £28,000 for broadcasting brief footage of online High Court hearing – Mike Dodd. The BBC has … is alcohol withdrawal fatalWebNov 17, 2024 · A legal challenge to Surrey County Council’s decision to allow 20 years of oil drilling and production to take place near Gatwick airport begins in the High Court today (17.11.20) The judicial review is brought by local Redhill resident Sarah Finch, supported by the Weald Action Group (WAG), an umbrella for local groups campaigning against ... is alcohol unhealthyWebFeb 3, 2024 · 9 April 2024. ...30 Only two authorities dealing with CPR 81.6 were identified: Finch v Surrey County Council (Application against the BBC) [2024] EWHC 170 (QB); … is alcohol withdrawal the worstWebDec 21, 2024 · Sarah Finch, from Redhill, had argued that Surrey County Council acted unlawfully in granting planning permission for 20 years of oil production at the Horse Hill … is al.com biasedWebAug 10, 2024 · The Supreme Court granted permission to appeal on 9 August 2024 in R (Finch) v Surrey County Council & Others, in which the Court of Appeal gave judgment in February [2024] PTSR 958.The case concerns the EIA of downstream effects of the use of oil extracted at Horse Hill, Surrey, in circumstances where the permissions if for … olive colored skinny pantsWebMar 2, 2024 · R (Finch) v Surrey County Council CA (Civ Div) [2024] EWCA Civ 187 “The task of the court in a claim such as this is only to decide the issues of law. Those issues cannot extend into the realm of political judgment – which is the responsibility of the executive, not the courts …”Consistent with a string of recent cases, the English Court of … is alcohol yeast poop